|
SEDRIS™ Technology Conference
2001
Panels and Presentations
|
.
.
The Panels and Presentations focused the spotlight on some of the latest
and most interesting innovations and activities in the field. Industry
leaders, practitioners, project managers, and other professionals discussed
and shared their experiences on a variety of interesting and thought-provoking
topics with regards to environmental data representation, tools, system
architectures, business approaches, trends, and technologies.
Quick Scroll To:
Introduction to Extensible 3D (X3D) Graphics
and VRML 200x
.
The X3D Task Group is designing and implementing the next-generation
Extensible 3D (X3D) Graphics specification. They are expressing the geometry
and behavior capabilities of the Virtual Reality Modeling Language (VRML
200x) using the Extensible Markup Language (XML).
.
This overview presentation covered the X3D tagset,
profiles for GeoVRML and Distributed Interactive Simulation (DIS), 1200+
example scenes including the X3D Conformance Suite, translation capabilities,
X3D Schema, Scene Authoring Interface (SAI) API, and the open-source Xj3D
browser. Copies of both Spring 2001 Web3D Software Development Kit (SDK)
CDs were provided to session attendees.
Presenter:
Donald Brutzman, U.S. Naval Postgraduate School
In Extensible
3D (X3D) Graphics: Virtual Reality Modeling Language (VRML) 200x,
Donald Brutzman began by providing background information on the Naval
Postgraduate School (NPS), the Modeling, Virtual Environments & Simulation
(MOVES) Institute, What are 3D graphics?, What is X3D?, X3D
motivations, and a Web3D ISO road map. He discussed X3D deliverables and
XML encoding. Donald continued by discussing X3D editing, in terms of the
X3D-Edit authoring tool, GeoVRML 1.0, and Internationalization (i18n).
He then addressed DIS and networking, discussing the IEEE standard DIS
protocol, an example using DIS-Java-VRML, and the four key network components
for large-scale virtual environments (LSVEs). He addressed the conformance
test suite, by discussing conformance testing with examples of conformance
results. He discussed the VRML/X3D object hierarchy, the scene authoring
interface, and the Xj3D Open Source project in terms of goals, functionality
and architecture. Donald concluded the presentation by addressing next
steps, and areas of mutual interest.
Integrated Natural Environment - Enabling Technologies
An overview was provided of the U.S. Defense Modeling and Simulation
Office initiatives in developing critical technologies to enable the specification,
generation, evaluation and delivery of fully integrated authoritative environmental
representations.
Presenter:
Juan Perez, Defense Modeling and Simulation Office (DMSO)
In Integrated
Natural Environment Program, Juan Perez began
by presenting the INE program requirements and goals. He provided an INE
technology area description, and discussed major projects in terms of environmental
domain services (MEL/ESG), environmental requirements/interchange (SEDRIS),
and environment integration/experimentation. He then provided a Terrain
Scenario Generation & Archiving (TSGA) overview, and addressed the
TSGA process. Juan concluded the presentation by identifying recent INE
program accomplishments.
The Environment Federation - Application of Novel
Environmental Techniques to Networked Simulation
An overview was provided of Environment Federation II technologies involving
the timely acquisition of geo-specific, full-spectrum environmental data,
delivered in SEDRIS Transmittal Format, which can be shared within a High
Level Architecture compliant federation using a Federation Object Model
based on the Environmental Data Coding Specification. This project served
as a useful demonstrator of the scope and nature of dynamic environment
and terrain modeling capabilities that are available today.
Presenter:
Robert Richbourg, Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA)
In The
Environment Federation: Simulated Environments Impact Tactical Operations,
Robert Richbourg began by providing an overview of the Environment Federation.
He discussed Ocean, Air and Space Environmental Services (OASES), and Dynamic
Terrain Simulation (DTSim). JSAF/ModStealth in EnviroFed II was addressed,
as was the hlaResults™ system. He continued by discussing
DMSO support for High Level Architecture (HLA), the development strategy
for FEDEP (Federation Development and Execution Process), environmental
common services projects (TSGA & ESG), and SEDRIS. Robert concluded
the presentation by addressing the Environment Federation Demonstration
and Experiment with examples and outcomes, and the EnviroFed III effort.
Panel: Modeling Urban Environments with High
Resolution Data
The panel focused its discussions on the following topics.
Topics:
- The Virtual Cities database development project
- .
- Game Technology for Virtual Cities
- .
- High Fidelity Urban Data in the Joint Assessment of Catastrophic Events
(JACE) Project
- .
- Collection of High Resolution Data using Light Detection and Ranging
(LIDAR) technology in the U.S. Army Rapid Terrain Visualization Advanced
Technology Demonstration
- .
- Transport and Dispersion Modeling in the Urban Canyon Environment,
U.S. Army Soldier and Biological Chemical Command
- .
- Another look at Transport and Dispersion Modeling
Panelists:
Robert Clover (Panel Chair), Institute for Defense Analyses
(IDA)
In Virtual
Emergency Response Training System, Robert Clover began by introducing
the other members of the Panel discussion. He then began to discuss the
Virtual Emergency Response Training System (VERTS), and the Institute for
Defense Analyses' (IDA) Virtual Cities. Numerous examples were provided
of Virtual Cities in and around the Philadelphia, Los Angeles, New York
City, and Washington, DC areas. Robert concluded the presentation with
a discussion of Civil Support Teams' use of VERTS and Virtual Cities, and
the Virtual Cities process.
.
David Colleen, Planet 9 Studios
In Game
Technology for Virtual Cities, David Colleen began by addressing the
history of city building at Planet 9 Studios. He discussed the Traveler
project as an outgrowth of a NIMA challenge to use state-of-the-art game
technology to develop truly useful military simulations. The lessons learned
from Traveler One were identified, and the continuation of a second phase
of the project, Traveler Two, was discussed. He then provided a brief overview
of game technology for simulation. David concluded the presentation by
discussing future steps -- next generation game platforms, and release
of digital cities in GeoVRML format.
.
Dean Kaul, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)
In CATS-JACE
Exploitation of High Fidelity Urban Data for Hazard Prediction & Consequences
Assessment, Dean Kaul began by providing a CATS-JACE overview, characterized
as a user of high resolution urban data. He discussed the Extended Collateral
Damage (ECD) model, and addressed ECD building data, providing examples
of human injury footprints. He then addressed Building Model Generator
(BMG) building model data, and structure representation and detail. Dean
discussed the Munitions Effects Vulnerability Assessment (MEVA) structural
damage analysis. He continued by addressing Multi-zonal Blowdown Model
(MBLM) structure input, agent distribution plan view, and chemical agent
leakage. Dean concluded the presentation by discussing the Building Catalog,
with examples of building footprints, information, model run results, and
supplementary materials.
.
Dave Baxter, Logicon - TASC
In Rapid
Terrain Visualization, Dave Baxter began with a discussion of the RTV
Acquire Digital Topographic Data (ACTD) mission, and data requirements.
He addressed RTV feature generation by discussing feature extraction software,
terrain data management, lines of communication, terrain categorization,
and feature attribution. He continued with a discussion of RTV Light Detection
and Ranging (LIDAR) technology, by addressing terrain resolution comparison,
LIDAR characteristics, and providing several example resolutions of sites
in and around Baltimore, Salt Lake City, and Washington, DC. Dave concluded
the presentation by addressing the LIDAR Toolkit, providing examples of
automated feature extraction from LIDAR data, collection areas/customers,
and providing a Conceptual Demonstration and points of contact.
.
John Pace, Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA)
In DTRA
Urban Dispersion Modeling, John Pace began by providing an overview
of the DTRA Urban Dispersion Modeling program -- what they do, goals, and
examples of models in use and sample model outputs. John concluded the
presentation with a discussion of urban terrain data requirements -- goals,
system requirements, current status, and formats/protocols.
.
Charles Woodhouse, ITT Industries
In Terrain
for CB Passive Defense Representation, Charles
Woodhouse began the presentation by creating a simulated "situation"
where a chemical or biological (CB) device/agent is released into the environment.
Given this "situation", he then discussed elements of the problem,
interactions, scales of interaction, timelines of interactions, and data
elements of concern. Charles concluded the presentation by addressing representation
challenges to be faced.
Panel: Use of Environmental Data in Social and
Civil Applications
The panel focused its discussions on the following topics.
Topics:
- Integrated Natural Environments Data Sampler
- .
- Lake Tahoe Data Clearinghouse Project
- .
- High Resolution Bathymetric Data Collection with Multibeam Sonar
- .
- Shallow-Water Bathymetric Data Collection with Airborne LIDAR
Panelists:
George Lukes (Panel Chair), Institute for Defense Analyses
(IDA)
In Integrated
Natural Environment Data Sampler Project, George Lukes began by discussing
the INE Data Sampler concept and process. He provided extensive data sampler
case examples, including a large area, low-resolution data set of Saudi
Arabia, and an operational-scale geotypical terrain database of Atlantis
(fictitious). He addressed EnvironFed III METOC data, and provided
examples from the Oceanside, CA, Camp Pendleton, CA, Twentynine Palms,
CA, and Lake Tahoe, NV areas. George concluded the presentation with a
discussion of data transformation and analysis.
.
Terry Rees, U. S. Geological Survey (USGS) - Nevada District
Terry Rees had no slides. He discussed the Lake
Tahoe Data Clearinghouse Project. Terry provided an overview of the
types of issues that affect the Lake Tahoe Basin -- tress are dying, erosion
in stream channels, decreasing clarity of the lake, and tight land control.
He explained that the data clearinghouse was started due to the need for
good, hard scientific and engineering data that could be applied to these
issues/problems. He discussed the fact that approximately 65 - 70 different
agencies have responsibilities for some aspects of management of things
within the Lake Tahoe Watershed. The data clearinghouse provides a central
location where all interested agencies can place their information, so
that all parties have access. The U. S. Geological Survey (USGS) was charged
with starting and maintaining the data clearinghouse.
.
Jim Gardner, USGS Marine Geology
In Mapping
Lake Tahoe with a High-resolution Multibeam Echosounder, Jim Gardner
described how he became involved in mapping Lake Tahoe, the techniques
used to map the lake, and then provided some examples of what the lake
looks like. He discussed the problems and inaccuracies with the early mapping
methods that were employed -- lead-line sounding, and the Tanner sounding
machine. He continued by addressing the progress of more recent years,
by discussing single-beam and multi-beam echosounders. He provided examples
from San Francisco Bay, and a 1998 bathymetry map of Lake Tahoe. Jim concluded
the presentation by addressing Lake Tahoe factoids, and mentioning the
2000 USGS lidar survey of Lake Tahoe, as a lead-in to the following presentation
by Eddie Wiggins.
.
Eddie Wiggins, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
In Airborne
LIDAR Shallow-Water Bathymetry Data Collection,
Eddie Wiggins began by addressing the mission of SHOALS (Scanning Hydrographic
Operational Airborne Lidar Survey). He discussed the Joint Airborne Lidar
Bathymetry Technical Center of Expertise, and the center staff. He introduced
the SHOALS airborne platform, and discussed the advantages of airborne
LIDAR, and a summary of airborne platform specifications. He continued
by addressing SHOALS survey applications, and discussing the equipment
layout. Eddie concluded the presentation with a discussion of how SHOALS
LIDAR works, with detailed illustrative examples of bathymetry results.
Optimizing the SEDRIS Core Software
Analyzing and improving the efficiency of software implementations of
SEDRIS technologies is an on-going task. Prior to releasing the latest
SEDRIS core software, an in-depth analysis and study of the software's
efficiency was undertaken. This presentation gives an overview of the findings
of this work, discusses some of the lessons learned, and outlines additional
future changes to the core software.
Presenter:
Jesse Campos, Science Applications International Corporation
(SAIC)
In Optimizing
the SEDRIS Core Software, Jesse Campos began
by addressing why it is desired to optimize the SEDRIS core software, in
terms of International standardization, stability, and education. He presented
the optimization goals, in terms of storage efficiency and access efficiency
for the Data Representation Model (DRM) and SEDRIS Transmittal Format (STF).
He concluded the presentation by presenting sample findings, and discussing
continued optimization work.
Panel: Innovating with SEDRIS-based Tools - Solutions
to Complex Problems
The panel focused its discussions on the following topics.
Topics:
- Tools and their contribution to making the database production/consumption
process more efficient
- .
- Plug-and-play framework for SEDRIS tools
- .
- Interoperability of SEDRIS tools: locally and globally
- .
- Existing tools, their capabilities and what problems they address
- .
- SEDRIS transmittal repository
- .
- Future of SEDRIS tools
Panelists:
David Shen (Panel Chair), Science Applications International
Corporation (SAIC)
In Innovating
with SEDRIS-based Tools - Solutions to Complex Problems,
David Shen began by introducing the other members of the Panel. He concluded
the presentation by discussing the tool domains, and identifying the topics/issues
to be covered by the other panel member speakers.
.
Michael Polis, TerraSim, Inc.
In TerraTools,
Michael Polis addressed database generation issues. He introduced the TerraTools®
application, discussing its organization and basic concepts. Michael concluded
the presentation by providing an example Condition Report Browser linked
with the TerraTools source data editor.
.
John Carswell, Reality by Design (RBD)
In Tools
to Support the Environmental Data Enterprise, John Carswell addressed
database conversion issues. He addressed developing an Enterprise-level
Perspective -- What it is, What drives you to it, What you do once you've
reached it, and What tools you see a need for as a result of reaching such
an Enterprise-level Perspective.
.
Tim Stone, Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA)
In The
Synthetic Environment Evaluation - Inspection Tool (SEE-IT), Tim Stone
addressed database analysis issues. He provided examples of anomalies identified
through the use of the Synthetic Environment Evaluation - Inspection Tool
(SEE-IT). He provided a comparison of current practices, versus using SEE-IT.
Tim concluded the presentation by identifying and discussing programs and
organizations that are using SEE-IT.
.
Warren Macchi, Arteon Corporation / AcuSoft, Inc.
In Innovating
with SEDRIS-based Tools - Solutions to Complex Problems,
Warren Macchi addressed database inspection issues. He provided examples
of modeling anomalies, terrain geometry, multi-channel comparison, and
feature comparison. Warren concluded the presentation by addressing Side-by-Side
(SBS) functionality -- What it is, the SBS plug-in interface, and an inter-application
interface.
.
Jesse Campos, Science Applications International Corporation
(SAIC)
Jesse Campos had no slides. He addressed tools
integration issues by discussing the future of SEDRIS tools, in which users
specialized in a localized area of interest will be leveraged to develop
tool solutions to solve larger SEDRIS issues.
Return to: Top
of this Page