Table A.1 lists some well known information coding systems and explains how this International Standard relates to each.
Table A.1 Coding systems and relationships
|
Coding system |
Relationship |
|
DIGEST |
Digital Geographic Information Exchange Standard (DIGEST) Part 4 of DIGEST is the Feature and Attribute Coding Catalogue (FACC). FACC is a comprehensive coding scheme for features, their attributes and attribute values. Some of the ECs in this International Standard had their origins in the features of FACC. Some of the EAs and EEs in this International Standard had their origins in the attributes and attribute enumerants of FACC. |
|
IHO |
International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) S-57 is the International Hydrographic Organization Transfer Standard for Digital Hydrographic Data. It consists of a feature dictionary, a data model, and an exchange format called DX-90. S-57 is an object-based data structure; its feature dictionary describes the geometry and attributes of all features that may appear on an electronic navigation chart (ENC). Some of the ECs in this International Standard had their origins in the features of S-57. Some of the EAs and EEs in this International Standard had their origins in the attributes and attribute enumerants of S-57. |
| WMO |
World Meteorological Organization
(WMO)
The WMO code form FM 94 BUFR is a binary code designed to represent, employing a continuous binary stream, any meteorological data. The WMO code form FM 92-VIII Ext. GRIB is a general purpose, bit-oriented data exchange format designed as an efficient vehicle for transmitting and storing large volumes of gridded data. Both incorporate standard mechanisms to define data categories (Table A) and classifications of elements (Table B). These are documented in the WMO Manual on Codes (Publication No. 306) - Volume I.1 Part A: Alphanumeric codes; Volume I.2 Part B: Binary codes and Part C: Common features to binary and alphanumeric codes; Volume II: Regional codes and national coding practices. Some of the EAs in this International Standard had their origins in the parameters of GRIB. |
| JMCDM |
Joint METOC Conceptual Data Model
(JMCDM)
Structurally, the JMCDM is comprised of four branches: Observation Data, Derived Data, Climatological Data, and Other Data of Astrometric Origin. The JMCDM and its supporting encyclopedia is a component set of views within the US DoD Data Model (DDM). Some of the ECs in this International Standard had their origins in the entities of the JMCDM. Some of the EAs and EEs in this International Standard had their origins in the entities of the JMCDM. |
| UCDM |
United States Imagery and Geospatial Information
System (USIGS) Conceptual Data Model (UCDM)
The UCDM includes a superset of the NIMA profile of FACC. None of the ECs, EAs and EEs in this International Standard had their origins in the entities of the UCDM. |
| SDTS |
Spatial Data Transfer Standard
(SDTS)
Part 2 of the SDTS specifically addresses the need for common definitions of spatial features, in particular both topographic and hydrographic. Annex A contains definitions for standard Entity Type terms. Annex B contains definitions for standard Attribute terms. None of the ECs, EAs and EEs in this International Standard had their origins in the entity type and attribute terms of SDTS. |
| OGC |
Open GIS Consortium (OGC)
The OpenGIS Specification does not define what is meant by a feature type (e.g., that represents a road). OpenGIS provides the standards for a feature dictionary, so that each community can develop its own common dictionary of geospatial feature types and attributes. This International Standard may be viewed as a collection of dictionaries developed by one community and none of the ECs, EAs and EEs in this International Standard had their origins in the work of OGC. |
| ISO TC 211 |
ISO TC 211
ISO TC 211 is developing standards in the field of digital geographic information. In particular DIS 19110 defines a methodology for creating geographic object and attribute and relationship catalogs. This methodology may be applicable to specifying EDCS Profiles. |